Ruttl
Live website feedback with inline CSS and content editing. The closest Pastel peer, with the addition of real-time collaboration and developer-tool integrations.
Aligno vs Ruttl →Two website review tools that both load the live page through a proxy, with no script on the site and no client login.
The difference is what happens after the comments. Does an earlier version show the page as it was or the page as it is today, can you hand the client a PDF of the sign-off, and does the bill grow per seat or stay flat for the agency?
Pastel is a website-first review tool. It loads the live page through its own proxy, the same approach Aligno uses, so reviewers comment without a script on the site or an extension in the browser. It also documents review flows for PDFs and image files, and its help pages describe review completion states such as approve and request changes.
Aligno reviews the same live page the same way, and both tools keep versions of a review. Where they differ is what an older version shows. Pastel's help center is explicit that a canvas is not a snapshot or a copy of your website: the live page is displayed and updates when the site changes, so the comments on an earlier version still sit on today's page. Aligno stores a screenshot of each page your client commented on, per version, so those comments and the sign-off stay on the page as it was.
The second difference is the sign-off document. Both tools record an Approve or Request Changes decision per version, and Pastel exports comments to CSV and to tools like Trello, Asana, and Jira. Aligno exports the comments and the decision history as a CSV and as a client-ready PDF you can put in the project file. The third is the bill: Aligno is one flat price for the agency with team seats included, where Pastel's plans include a set number of users and extra seats are paid add-ons.
This table summarizes publicly visible positioning and product scope.
Both tools support collecting visual feedback from clients. The key difference is workflow emphasis and how teams run review rounds.
For current rates, see Pastel's plans page and Aligno's pricing page. Aligno's price is one flat amount for the agency whatever the number of client sites or reviewers.
If Pastel isn't the right fit, the tools below each bring a different emphasis to client feedback and website review, from inline editing to multi-format proofing to developer bug tracking. Each link goes to a focused side-by-side comparison.
Live website feedback with inline CSS and content editing. The closest Pastel peer, with the addition of real-time collaboration and developer-tool integrations.
Aligno vs Ruttl →Broad multi-format review covering websites, images, PDFs, and video with 30+ file types. Heavier than Pastel, and it no longer has a free plan.
Aligno vs Markup.io →Visual bug tracking on live websites with automatic technical metadata. Better when website feedback needs to flow into a developer ticket queue.
Aligno vs BugHerd →Creative proofing with version comparison and approval rounds. A stronger fit when the workflow involves image- and video-heavy creative deliverables alongside websites.
Aligno vs GoVisually →Want the full field? See all design feedback tool alternatives compared.
Yes. The Aligno free plan covers one live website with unlimited pages and reviewers, with no credit card and no time limit on the comments. Pastel's free plan allows one active canvas at a time, and each canvas has a three-day commenting window after which new comments stop.
No. Clients open a share link, comment on the live page, and approve without creating an account. Pastel works much the same way: guests enter a name and email to comment and no account is created, so this is not where the two differ.
Yes. Both tools load the live page through their own proxy, so there is no script to add to the site and no extension for the reviewer, and both can open a site you do not control. Both also keep versions. The difference is what an older version shows. Pastel's help center says a canvas is not a snapshot or a copy of your website and updates when the site changes, so an earlier version's comments still sit on today's page. Aligno stores a screenshot of each page your client commented on, per version, so those comments and the sign-off stay on the page as it was.
Feedback collects opinions. Approval creates a decision record. Both tools record an Approve or Request Changes decision per version. In Aligno that record, together with the comments, exports on Pro and Studio as a CSV or a client-ready PDF sign-off document you can put in the project file. Pastel exports comments to CSV and to integrations such as Trello, Asana, and Jira; we found no PDF sign-off document in its documentation.
Product details may change over time. Always review official vendor pages before making a purchase decision.
Source pages used for this comparison: Pastel homepage, Pastel plans, Pastel approve / request changes documentation, Pastel versions documentation, Pastel export documentation, Pastel website review (proxy, not a snapshot), Aligno docs, Aligno pricing.
Related pages: Design feedback tool, Client approval software, Markup.io alternative comparison, See all design feedback tool alternatives.
The fastest way to choose fairly is running the same review on each tool, then changing the page and seeing where the comments end up. Aligno's free plan takes minutes to set up.