Ruttl
Live website feedback with inline CSS and content editing. The closest Pastel peer, with the addition of real-time collaboration and developer-tool integrations.
Aligno vs Ruttl →Compare an approval-first review workflow with a website-review tool that also supports PDFs and image files.
Both tools collect visual feedback from clients. The difference is what happens after. Can reviewers formally approve a version, and do you have a record to point to when scope questions come up later?
Pastel supports live website review and also documents review flows for PDFs and image files. Its product and help pages also describe review completion states such as approve and request changes.
Aligno covers the same broad asset categories for client review, but it cares more about the approval step at the end of each version round.
It supports images, PDFs, videos, and live webpages in the same workspace, and it adds an explicit approval step at the end of each review round. Free plan available with no credit card required.
This table summarizes publicly visible positioning and product scope.
Both tools support collecting visual feedback from clients. The key difference is workflow emphasis and how teams run review rounds.
If Pastel isn't the right fit, the tools below each bring a different emphasis to client feedback and website review — from inline editing to multi-format proofing to developer bug tracking. Each link goes to a focused side-by-side comparison.
Live website feedback with inline CSS and content editing. The closest Pastel peer, with the addition of real-time collaboration and developer-tool integrations.
Aligno vs Ruttl →Broad multi-format review covering websites, images, PDFs, and video with 30+ file types. Heavier than Pastel; Pro recently moved to $79/mo.
Aligno vs Markup.io →Visual bug tracking on live websites with automatic technical metadata. Better when website feedback needs to flow into a developer ticket queue.
Aligno vs BugHerd →Creative proofing with version comparison and approval rounds. A stronger fit when the workflow involves image- and video-heavy creative deliverables alongside websites.
Aligno vs GoVisually →Want the full field? See all design feedback tool alternatives compared.
Yes. Aligno has a free plan with no credit card required. You can upload designs, share review links with clients, and collect pinned feedback and approvals on the free tier.
No. Clients access your review via a share link and can leave comments and approve designs without creating an Aligno account. This is true on all plans.
Yes. Aligno supports live webpage review alongside images and PDFs. Clients can click anywhere on the live page to leave a pinned comment, the same way they would on an image or PDF.
Feedback collects opinions. Approval creates a decision record. When a client clicks Approve in Aligno, that action is logged against the exact version they reviewed. You get a clear record of what was signed off and when, not just a comment thread to interpret.
Product details may change over time. Always review official vendor pages before making a purchase decision.
Source pages used for this comparison: Pastel homepage, Pastel plans, Pastel approval workflow docs, Aligno docs, Aligno pricing.
Related pages: Design feedback tool, Client approval software, Markup.io alternative comparison, See all design feedback tool alternatives.
The fastest way to choose fairly is running the same review on each tool. Aligno's free plan takes minutes to set up.